<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Post-Classical fun, part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.eighthblackbird.com/2007/12/08/post-classical-fun-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.eighthblackbird.com/2007/12/08/post-classical-fun-part-2/</link>
	<description>Adventures (in new music) with eighth blackbird</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:35:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mike jolkovski</title>
		<link>http://blog.eighthblackbird.com/2007/12/08/post-classical-fun-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>mike jolkovski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 01:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eighthblackbird.com/blog/2007/12/08/post-classical-fun-part-2/#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>1. Alt-classical! I can&#039;t tell you how happy that makes me. The first important development of the post-Stockhausen era!

2. w/r/t/ costumes, remember the words of David Byrne, about the Big Suit in the Stop Making Sense tour: &quot;We decided it was important to show there is a place for theatrical artifice in rock music&quot; or words to that effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Alt-classical! I can&#8217;t tell you how happy that makes me. The first important development of the post-Stockhausen era!</p>
<p>2. w/r/t/ costumes, remember the words of David Byrne, about the Big Suit in the Stop Making Sense tour: &#8220;We decided it was important to show there is a place for theatrical artifice in rock music&#8221; or words to that effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael J. Maccaferri</title>
		<link>http://blog.eighthblackbird.com/2007/12/08/post-classical-fun-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1405</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael J. Maccaferri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eighthblackbird.com/blog/2007/12/08/post-classical-fun-part-2/#comment-1405</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up, DJA!  I&#039;m tweaking the code right this moment.  Hopefully it will behave for Safari now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up, DJA!  I&#8217;m tweaking the code right this moment.  Hopefully it will behave for Safari now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJA</title>
		<link>http://blog.eighthblackbird.com/2007/12/08/post-classical-fun-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1404</link>
		<dc:creator>DJA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 22:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eighthblackbird.com/blog/2007/12/08/post-classical-fun-part-2/#comment-1404</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Greg feels that there is a breadth in the styles and sounds in popular music that doesn’t exist in classical music, and popular music has its own conflict between “art” and “entertainment”. (I feel that he contradicted himself later in his presentation, when he commented that “popular musicians don’t even use a word like ‘art’.”)&lt;/i&gt;

This may seem like a contradiction, but it&#039;s actually an excellent illustration of how thoroughly nonclassical musicians distrust the term &quot;art music,&quot; which has been leeched dry by the classical establishment. People in the nonclassical music world still have fights over art vs. entertainment -- they just don&#039;t like to use the word &quot;art.&quot; (Because seriously, who the hell wants to listen to something called &quot;art rock&quot;?) Instead, the discussion is framed as &quot;indie vs. major,&quot; &quot;real punk vs. pop punk,&quot; &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/31/arts/music/31sann.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rockists vs. poptimists&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; etc. But it&#039;s all the same stupid false dichotomy, no matter how you describe it.

(BTW, there is a bug in your Antispam text field -- at least in Safari, clicking on the field makes the cursor jump up to the Website&quot; field. The only way to actually get the cursor in the Antispam field is to first click on the Email field and then press Tab. Wha?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Greg feels that there is a breadth in the styles and sounds in popular music that doesn’t exist in classical music, and popular music has its own conflict between “art” and “entertainment”. (I feel that he contradicted himself later in his presentation, when he commented that “popular musicians don’t even use a word like ‘art’.”)</i></p>
<p>This may seem like a contradiction, but it&#8217;s actually an excellent illustration of how thoroughly nonclassical musicians distrust the term &#8220;art music,&#8221; which has been leeched dry by the classical establishment. People in the nonclassical music world still have fights over art vs. entertainment &#8212; they just don&#8217;t like to use the word &#8220;art.&#8221; (Because seriously, who the hell wants to listen to something called &#8220;art rock&#8221;?) Instead, the discussion is framed as &#8220;indie vs. major,&#8221; &#8220;real punk vs. pop punk,&#8221; &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/31/arts/music/31sann.html" rel="nofollow">rockists vs. poptimists</a>,&#8221; etc. But it&#8217;s all the same stupid false dichotomy, no matter how you describe it.</p>
<p>(BTW, there is a bug in your Antispam text field &#8212; at least in Safari, clicking on the field makes the cursor jump up to the Website&#8221; field. The only way to actually get the cursor in the Antispam field is to first click on the Email field and then press Tab. Wha?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
